Intel Core i9-10900KF vs AMD EPYC 7302P

What is the difference between Intel Core i9-10900KF and AMD EPYC 7302P. Find out which CPU has better performance.

Performance (Benchmarks)

1379Geekbench 5 Single-Core Score811
10791Geekbench 5 Multi-Core Score10412
23806PassMark CPU Mark Rating32480
3135PassMark Single Thread Rating1878
136783DMark Time Spy Physics Score

Processor Specs

Intel Core i9-10900KFProcessorAMD EPYC 7302P
3700 MHzFrequency3000 MHz
5300 MHzMaximum Frequency3300 MHz
10Cores16
20Threads32
125 WTDP155 W
Comet LakeCodenameRome
Socket 1200 LGAPackageSocket SP3 (4094)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark

1373Single-Core Score809
11792Multi-Core Score804
Geekbench 5.3.1 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)BenchmarkGeekbench 5.4.1 Tryout for Linux x86 (64-bit)

System Information

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)Operating SystemUbuntu 18.04.5 LTS
ASUS System Product NameModelRed Hat KVM
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME Z490-VMotherboardN/A
High performancePower Plan

CPU Specifications

Intel Core i9-10900KFNameAMD EPYC 7302P
1 Processor, 10 Cores, 20 ThreadsTopology1 Processor, 1 Core
GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 165 Stepping 5IdentifierAuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 49 Stepping 0
3.70 GHzBase Frequency3.00 GHz
5.10 GHzMaximum Frequency
Socket 1200 LGAPackage
Comet LakeCodename
32.0 KB x 10L1 Instruction Cache64.0 KB x 1
32.0 KB x 10L1 Data Cache64.0 KB x 1
256 KB x 10L2 Cache512 KB x 1
20.0 MB x 1L3 Cache16.0 MB x 1

Memory Information

16.00 GBSize985 MB
2098 MHzFrequency
DDR4 SDRAMType
2Channels

Geekbench 5 result (single)

1373Single-Core Score809
1731Crypto Score1606
1274Integer Score714
1528Floating Point Score 882
1731
2.95 GB/sec
AES-XTS1606
2.74 GB/sec
1273
6.44 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)713
3.61 MB/sec
1481
70.0 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression874
41.3 Mpixels/sec
1288
3.63 MTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)677
1.91 MTE/sec
1211
1.42 MElements/sec
HTML5657
771.1 KElements/sec
1212
379.8 Krows/sec
SQLite621
194.7 Krows/sec
1285
69.7 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering735
39.9 Mpixels/sec
1291
411.3 KB/sec
Text Rendering660
210.3 KB/sec
1251
9.75 Klines/sec
Clang673
5.24 Klines/sec
1198
13.9 images/sec
Camera856
9.93 images/sec
1249
1.56 Mpairs/sec
N-Body Physics646
808.2 Kpairs/sec
1396
8645.9 FPS
Rigid Body Physics848
5251.7 FPS
1221
67.1 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur960
52.8 Mpixels/sec
1314
10.1 images/sec
Face Detection848
6.53 images/sec
1299
32.0 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection787
19.4 Mpixels/sec
2442
119.8 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting1404
68.9 Mpixels/sec
2592
35.3 Mpixels/sec
HDR1580
21.5 Mpixels/sec
1683
1.35 Mpixels/sec
Ray Tracing915
734.5 Kpixels/sec
1225
11.0 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion742
6.65 Kpixels/sec
1503
48.1 Words/sec
Speech Recognition640
20.5 Words/sec
1486
57.4 images/sec
Machine Learning744
28.8 images/sec

Geekbench 5 result (multi)

11792Multi-Core Score804
7931Crypto Score1606
11758Integer Score691
12510Floating Point Score 915
7931
13.5 GB/sec
AES-XTS1606
2.74 GB/sec
15257
77.2 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)655
3.31 MB/sec
16539
782.4 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression894
42.3 Mpixels/sec
5046
14.2 MTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)690
1.95 MTE/sec
12103
14.2 MElements/sec
HTML5579
680.0 KElements/sec
13811
4.33 Mrows/sec
SQLite568
177.9 Krows/sec
13113
711.6 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering660
35.8 Mpixels/sec
9625
2.99 MB/sec
Text Rendering625
199.3 KB/sec
14500
113.0 Klines/sec
Clang752
5.86 Klines/sec
11025
127.8 images/sec
Camera872
10.1 images/sec
12647
15.8 Mpairs/sec
N-Body Physics787
984.2 Kpairs/sec
18378
113856.3 FPS
Rigid Body Physics844
5229.0 FPS
12483
686.2 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur947
52.0 Mpixels/sec
14114
108.7 images/sec
Face Detection741
5.70 images/sec
11812
291.1 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection814
20.1 Mpixels/sec
18039
884.9 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting1482
72.7 Mpixels/sec
23684
322.7 Mpixels/sec
HDR1892
25.8 Mpixels/sec
18380
14.8 Mpixels/sec
Ray Tracing1131
908.4 Kpixels/sec
12004
107.5 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion741
6.64 Kpixels/sec
7179
229.5 Words/sec
Speech Recognition618
19.8 Words/sec
3588
138.6 images/sec
Machine Learning682
26.4 images/sec