AMD EPYC 7302P vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4

What is the difference between AMD EPYC 7302P and Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4. Find out which CPU has better performance.

Performance (Benchmarks)

811Geekbench 5 Single-Core Score749
10412Geekbench 5 Multi-Core Score8538
32480PassMark CPU Mark Rating17925
1878PassMark Single Thread Rating1947

Processor Specs

AMD EPYC 7302PProcessorIntel Xeon E5-2680 v4
3000 MHzFrequency2400 MHz
3300 MHzMaximum Frequency3300 MHz
16Cores14
32Threads28
155 WTDP120 W
RomeCodenameBroadwell-E/EP, Haswell-E/EP
Socket SP3 (4094)PackageSocket 2011 LGA

Geekbench 5 Benchmark

809Single-Core Score749
804Multi-Core Score14230
Geekbench 5.4.1 Tryout for Linux x86 (64-bit)BenchmarkGeekbench 5.4.1 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)

System Information

Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTSOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Red Hat KVMModelINTEL X99
N/AMotherboardINTEL X99
Power PlanBalanced

CPU Specifications

AMD EPYC 7302PNameIntel Xeon E5-2680 v4
1 Processor, 1 CoreTopology2 Processors, 28 Cores, 56 Threads
AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 49 Stepping 0IdentifierGenuineIntel Family 6 Model 79 Stepping 1
3.00 GHzBase Frequency2.39 GHz
Maximum Frequency3292 MHz
PackageSocket 2011 LGA
CodenameBroadwell-E/EP
64.0 KB x 1L1 Instruction Cache32.0 KB x 14
64.0 KB x 1L1 Data Cache32.0 KB x 14
512 KB x 1L2 Cache256 KB x 14
16.0 MB x 1L3 Cache35.0 MB x 1

Memory Information

985 MBSize128.00 GB
Frequency1064 MHz
TypeDDR4 SDRAM
Channels4

Geekbench 5 result (single)

809Single-Core Score749
1606Crypto Score1045
714Integer Score708
882Floating Point Score 790
1606
2.74 GB/sec
AES-XTS1045
1.78 GB/sec
713
3.61 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)810
4.10 MB/sec
874
41.3 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression759
35.9 Mpixels/sec
677
1.91 MTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)773
2.18 MTE/sec
657
771.1 KElements/sec
HTML5668
784.6 KElements/sec
621
194.7 Krows/sec
SQLite638
199.9 Krows/sec
735
39.9 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering701
38.1 Mpixels/sec
660
210.3 KB/sec
Text Rendering682
217.4 KB/sec
673
5.24 Klines/sec
Clang694
5.40 Klines/sec
856
9.93 images/sec
Camera661
7.66 images/sec
646
808.2 Kpairs/sec
N-Body Physics690
862.8 Kpairs/sec
848
5251.7 FPS
Rigid Body Physics773
4792.0 FPS
960
52.8 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur626
34.4 Mpixels/sec
848
6.53 images/sec
Face Detection683
5.26 images/sec
787
19.4 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection715
17.6 Mpixels/sec
1404
68.9 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting1240
60.8 Mpixels/sec
1580
21.5 Mpixels/sec
HDR1313
17.9 Mpixels/sec
915
734.5 Kpixels/sec
Ray Tracing914
733.7 Kpixels/sec
742
6.65 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion631
5.65 Kpixels/sec
640
20.5 Words/sec
Speech Recognition830
26.5 Words/sec
744
28.8 images/sec
Machine Learning586
22.6 images/sec

Geekbench 5 result (multi)

804Multi-Core Score14230
1606Crypto Score8621
691Integer Score14294
915Floating Point Score 15026
1606
2.74 GB/sec
AES-XTS8621
14.7 GB/sec
655
3.31 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)22188
112.2 MB/sec
894
42.3 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression23551
1.11 Gpixels/sec
690
1.95 MTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)5074
14.3 MTE/sec
579
680.0 KElements/sec
HTML516014
18.8 MElements/sec
568
177.9 Krows/sec
SQLite19191
6.01 Mrows/sec
660
35.8 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering12572
682.3 Mpixels/sec
625
199.3 KB/sec
Text Rendering9913
3.08 MB/sec
752
5.86 Klines/sec
Clang20695
161.2 Klines/sec
872
10.1 images/sec
Camera11856
137.4 images/sec
787
984.2 Kpairs/sec
N-Body Physics8175
10.2 Mpairs/sec
844
5229.0 FPS
Rigid Body Physics26800
166038.0 FPS
947
52.0 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur15946
876.6 Mpixels/sec
741
5.70 images/sec
Face Detection22154
170.6 images/sec
814
20.1 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection14460
356.4 Mpixels/sec
1482
72.7 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting23605
1.16 Gpixels/sec
1892
25.8 Mpixels/sec
HDR28108
383.0 Mpixels/sec
1131
908.4 Kpixels/sec
Ray Tracing19792
15.9 Mpixels/sec
741
6.64 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion13505
121.0 Kpixels/sec
618
19.8 Words/sec
Speech Recognition10151
324.6 Words/sec
682
26.4 images/sec
Machine Learning4375
169.0 images/sec