AMD EPYC 7302P vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4

What is the difference between AMD EPYC 7302P and Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4. Find out which CPU has better performance.

Performance (Benchmarks)

811Geekbench 5 Single-Core Score807
10412Geekbench 5 Multi-Core Score9806
32480PassMark CPU Mark Rating20776
1878PassMark Single Thread Rating2132

Processor Specs

AMD EPYC 7302PProcessorIntel Xeon E5-2690 v4
3000 MHzFrequency2600 MHz
3300 MHzMaximum Frequency3500 MHz
16Cores14
32Threads28
155 WTDP135 W
RomeCodenameBroadwell-E/EP
Socket SP3 (4094)PackageSocket 2011 LGA

Geekbench 5 Benchmark

809Single-Core Score810
804Multi-Core Score4966
Geekbench 5.4.1 Tryout for Linux x86 (64-bit)BenchmarkGeekbench 5.4.1 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)

System Information

Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTSOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Red Hat KVMModelMicrosoft Corporation Virtual Machine
N/AMotherboardMicrosoft Corporation Virtual Machine
Power PlanHigh performance

CPU Specifications

AMD EPYC 7302PNameIntel Xeon E5-2690 v4
1 Processor, 1 CoreTopology1 Processor, 6 Cores, 12 Threads
AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 49 Stepping 0IdentifierGenuineIntel Family 6 Model 79 Stepping 1
3.00 GHzBase Frequency2.59 GHz
Maximum Frequency3171 MHz
PackageSocket 2011 LGA
CodenameBroadwell-E/EP
64.0 KB x 1L1 Instruction Cache32.0 KB x 6
64.0 KB x 1L1 Data Cache32.0 KB x 6
512 KB x 1L2 Cache256 KB x 6
16.0 MB x 1L3 Cache35.0 MB x 1

Memory Information

985 MBSize112.00 GB

Geekbench 5 result (single)

809Single-Core Score810
1606Crypto Score1110
714Integer Score759
882Floating Point Score 871
1606
2.74 GB/sec
AES-XTS1110
1.89 GB/sec
713
3.61 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)859
4.34 MB/sec
874
41.3 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression887
42.0 Mpixels/sec
677
1.91 MTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)756
2.13 MTE/sec
657
771.1 KElements/sec
HTML5703
825.9 KElements/sec
621
194.7 Krows/sec
SQLite737
230.9 Krows/sec
735
39.9 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering749
40.6 Mpixels/sec
660
210.3 KB/sec
Text Rendering712
227.0 KB/sec
673
5.24 Klines/sec
Clang767
5.98 Klines/sec
856
9.93 images/sec
Camera685
7.95 images/sec
646
808.2 Kpairs/sec
N-Body Physics737
922.4 Kpairs/sec
848
5251.7 FPS
Rigid Body Physics871
5393.8 FPS
960
52.8 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur684
37.6 Mpixels/sec
848
6.53 images/sec
Face Detection816
6.28 images/sec
787
19.4 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection786
19.4 Mpixels/sec
1404
68.9 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting1374
67.4 Mpixels/sec
1580
21.5 Mpixels/sec
HDR1440
19.6 Mpixels/sec
915
734.5 Kpixels/sec
Ray Tracing1034
830.5 Kpixels/sec
742
6.65 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion695
6.23 Kpixels/sec
640
20.5 Words/sec
Speech Recognition841
26.9 Words/sec
744
28.8 images/sec
Machine Learning647
25.0 images/sec

Geekbench 5 result (multi)

804Multi-Core Score4966
1606Crypto Score7137
691Integer Score4659
915Floating Point Score 5268
1606
2.74 GB/sec
AES-XTS7137
12.2 GB/sec
655
3.31 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)5980
30.2 MB/sec
894
42.3 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression5621
265.9 Mpixels/sec
690
1.95 MTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)4205
11.9 MTE/sec
579
680.0 KElements/sec
HTML53992
4.69 MElements/sec
568
177.9 Krows/sec
SQLite4671
1.46 Mrows/sec
660
35.8 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering5191
281.7 Mpixels/sec
625
199.3 KB/sec
Text Rendering4137
1.29 MB/sec
752
5.86 Klines/sec
Clang4791
37.3 Klines/sec
872
10.1 images/sec
Camera3811
44.2 images/sec
787
984.2 Kpairs/sec
N-Body Physics3892
4.87 Mpairs/sec
844
5229.0 FPS
Rigid Body Physics6163
38183.0 FPS
947
52.0 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur4408
242.3 Mpixels/sec
741
5.70 images/sec
Face Detection5066
39.0 images/sec
814
20.1 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection5296
130.5 Mpixels/sec
1482
72.7 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting7759
380.7 Mpixels/sec
1892
25.8 Mpixels/sec
HDR8937
121.8 Mpixels/sec
1131
908.4 Kpixels/sec
Ray Tracing6610
5.31 Mpixels/sec
741
6.64 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion4240
38.0 Kpixels/sec
618
19.8 Words/sec
Speech Recognition4698
150.2 Words/sec
682
26.4 images/sec
Machine Learning3345
129.3 images/sec