Intel Celeron G1610T vs AMD Phenom X4 9500

What is the difference between Intel Celeron G1610T and AMD Phenom X4 9500. Find out which CPU has better performance.

Performance (Benchmarks)

331Geekbench 5 Single-Core Score199
684Geekbench 5 Multi-Core Score679
1285PassMark CPU Mark Rating
1179PassMark Single Thread Rating

Processor Specs

Intel Celeron G1610TProcessorAMD Phenom X4 9500
2300 MHzFrequency2200 MHz
2Cores4
2Threads4
35 WTDP95 W
Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsGPU
Ivy BridgeCodenameAgena
FCLGA1155PackageSocket AM2+ (940)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark

313Single-Core Score199
591Multi-Core Score717
Geekbench 5.4.0 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)BenchmarkGeekbench 5.4.1 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)

System Information

Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Datacenter Evaluation (64-bit)Operating SystemWindows 10 Pro (64-bit)
HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8ModelBIOSTAR Group A780LB
MotherboardBIOSTAR Group A780LB
BalancedPower Plan

CPU Specifications

Intel Celeron G1610TNameAMD Phenom X4 9500
1 Processor, 2 CoresTopology1 Processor, 4 Cores
GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9IdentifierAuthenticAMD Family 16 Model 2 Stepping 2
2.26 GHzBase Frequency2.20 GHz
2.26 GHzMaximum Frequency2199 MHz
Socket 1155 LGAPackageSocket AM2+ (940)
Ivy BridgeCodenameAgena
32.0 KB x 1L1 Instruction Cache64.0 KB x 4
32.0 KB x 1L1 Data Cache64.0 KB x 4
256 KB x 1L2 Cache512 KB x 4
2.00 MB x 1L3 Cache2.00 MB x 1

Memory Information

7.84 GBSize4.00 GB
656 MHzFrequency333 MHz
DDR3 SDRAMTypeDDR2 SDRAM
2Channels2

Geekbench 5 result (single)

313Single-Core Score199
37Crypto Score39
325Integer Score229
332Floating Point Score 162
37
64.3 MB/sec
AES-XTS39
68.9 MB/sec
340
1.72 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)135
701.0 KB/sec
383
18.1 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression345
16.3 Mpixels/sec
347
978.5 KTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)138
390.2 KTE/sec
299
350.6 KElements/sec
HTML5294
345.6 KElements/sec
302
94.6 Krows/sec
SQLite270
84.7 Krows/sec
300
16.3 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering265
14.4 Mpixels/sec
331
105.3 KB/sec
Text Rendering250
79.6 KB/sec
304
2.37 Klines/sec
Clang239
1.87 Klines/sec
325
3.77 images/sec
Camera218
2.52 images/sec
268
335.8 Kpairs/sec
N-Body Physics70
87.5 Kpairs/sec
360
2230.2 FPS
Rigid Body Physics299
1849.3 FPS
269
14.8 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur126
6.92 Mpixels/sec
339
2.61 images/sec
Face Detection171
1.32 images/sec
363
8.94 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection199
4.89 Mpixels/sec
562
27.6 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting225
11.1 Mpixels/sec
628
8.55 Mpixels/sec
HDR460
6.27 Mpixels/sec
372
298.6 Kpixels/sec
Ray Tracing133
106.9 Kpixels/sec
246
2.20 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion155
1.39 Kpixels/sec
296
9.47 Words/sec
Speech Recognition123
3.94 Words/sec
175
6.78 images/sec
Machine Learning88
3.40 images/sec

Geekbench 5 result (multi)

591Multi-Core Score717
70Crypto Score145
614Integer Score813
627Floating Point Score 603
70
122.8 MB/sec
AES-XTS145
253.2 MB/sec
656
3.32 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)484
2.45 MB/sec
716
33.9 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression1373
65.0 Mpixels/sec
593
1.67 MTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)354
997.9 KTE/sec
589
691.4 KElements/sec
HTML51095
1.29 MElements/sec
529
165.8 Krows/sec
SQLite1047
327.9 Krows/sec
637
34.6 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering954
51.8 Mpixels/sec
633
201.7 KB/sec
Text Rendering811
258.4 KB/sec
556
4.33 Klines/sec
Clang882
6.87 Klines/sec
634
7.35 images/sec
Camera841
9.75 images/sec
490
613.4 Kpairs/sec
N-Body Physics250
312.6 Kpairs/sec
676
4188.0 FPS
Rigid Body Physics1158
7172.2 FPS
644
35.4 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur588
32.3 Mpixels/sec
650
5.00 images/sec
Face Detection738
5.68 images/sec
675
16.6 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection713
17.6 Mpixels/sec
990
48.5 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting779
38.2 Mpixels/sec
1188
16.2 Mpixels/sec
HDR1669
22.7 Mpixels/sec
775
622.6 Kpixels/sec
Ray Tracing503
403.9 Kpixels/sec
466
4.18 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion594
5.32 Kpixels/sec
504
16.1 Words/sec
Speech Recognition393
12.6 Words/sec
293
11.3 images/sec
Machine Learning279
10.8 images/sec