AMD PRO A6-9500 vs Intel Celeron J4005

What is the difference between AMD PRO A6-9500 and Intel Celeron J4005. Find out which CPU has better performance.

Performance (Benchmarks)

477Geekbench 5 Single-Core Score427
784Geekbench 5 Multi-Core Score781
1884PassMark CPU Mark Rating1581
1617PassMark Single Thread Rating1116
3DMark Time Spy Physics Score618

Processor Specs

AMD PRO A6-9500ProcessorIntel Celeron J4005
3500 MHzFrequency2000 MHz
3800 MHzMaximum Frequency2700 MHz
2Cores2
2Threads2
65 WTDP10 W
Radeon R5 SeriesGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600
Bristol Ridge PROCodenameGemini Lake
AM4PackageFCBGA1090

Geekbench 5 Benchmark

471Single-Core Score427
839Multi-Core Score726
Geekbench 5.4.1 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)BenchmarkGeekbench 5.4.1 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)

System Information

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)Operating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Enterprise (64-bit)
ECS A320AM4-M3DModelHP HP Slim Desktop 290-a0xxx
ECS A320AM4-M3DMotherboardHP 8441
Alto rendimientoPower PlanBalanced

CPU Specifications

AMD A6-9500NameIntel Celeron J4005
1 Processor, 2 CoresTopology1 Processor, 2 Cores
AuthenticAMD Family 21 Model 101 Stepping 1IdentifierGenuineIntel Family 6 Model 122 Stepping 1
3.49 GHzBase Frequency2.00 GHz
3792 MHzMaximum Frequency2672 MHz
Socket AM4 (1331)PackageSocket 1090 FCBGA
Bristol RidgeCodenameGemini Lake
96.0 KB x 1L1 Instruction Cache32.0 KB x 2
32.0 KB x 2L1 Data Cache24.0 KB x 2
1.00 MB x 1L2 Cache4.00 MB x 1

Memory Information

8.00 GBSize4.00 GB
1197 MHzFrequency1187 MHz
DDR4 SDRAMTypeDDR4 SDRAM
1Channels

Geekbench 5 result (single)

471Single-Core Score427
705Crypto Score605
455Integer Score425
468Floating Point Score 400
705
1.20 GB/sec
AES-XTS605
1.03 GB/sec
399
2.02 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)447
2.26 MB/sec
697
33.0 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression501
23.7 Mpixels/sec
398
1.12 MTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)396
1.12 MTE/sec
430
504.8 KElements/sec
HTML5410
481.8 KElements/sec
505
158.4 Krows/sec
SQLite429
134.5 Krows/sec
520
28.2 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering426
23.1 Mpixels/sec
417
132.8 KB/sec
Text Rendering438
139.5 KB/sec
429
3.34 Klines/sec
Clang420
3.28 Klines/sec
377
4.37 images/sec
Camera372
4.31 images/sec
270
337.9 Kpairs/sec
N-Body Physics337
421.6 Kpairs/sec
497
3082.0 FPS
Rigid Body Physics455
2819.3 FPS
284
15.6 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur354
19.4 Mpixels/sec
322
2.48 images/sec
Face Detection437
3.37 images/sec
477
11.7 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection445
11.0 Mpixels/sec
839
41.2 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting693
34.0 Mpixels/sec
1064
14.5 Mpixels/sec
HDR750
10.2 Mpixels/sec
642
515.7 Kpixels/sec
Ray Tracing485
389.1 Kpixels/sec
470
4.21 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion322
2.89 Kpixels/sec
361
11.5 Words/sec
Speech Recognition349
11.1 Words/sec
419
16.2 images/sec
Machine Learning139
5.38 images/sec

Geekbench 5 result (multi)

839Multi-Core Score726
1148Crypto Score687
837Integer Score720
791Floating Point Score 747
1148
1.96 GB/sec
AES-XTS687
1.17 GB/sec
840
4.25 MB/sec
Text Compression (LZMA)642
3.24 MB/sec
1235
58.4 Mpixels/sec
Image Compression780
36.9 Mpixels/sec
625
1.76 MTE/sec
Navigation (using Dijkstra's algorithm)623
1.76 MTE/sec
989
1.16 MElements/sec
HTML5747
876.8 KElements/sec
946
296.3 Krows/sec
SQLite768
240.5 Krows/sec
938
50.9 Mpixels/sec
PDF Rendering777
42.2 Mpixels/sec
747
238.0 KB/sec
Text Rendering728
231.8 KB/sec
765
5.96 Klines/sec
Clang763
5.95 Klines/sec
622
7.21 images/sec
Camera677
7.85 images/sec
468
585.8 Kpairs/sec
N-Body Physics639
800.1 Kpairs/sec
957
5928.3 FPS
Rigid Body Physics862
5338.8 FPS
831
45.7 Mpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur673
37.0 Mpixels/sec
611
4.71 images/sec
Face Detection833
6.41 images/sec
783
19.3 Mpixels/sec
Horizon Detection824
20.3 Mpixels/sec
1074
52.7 Mpixels/sec
Image Inpainting1159
56.9 Mpixels/sec
1726
23.5 Mpixels/sec
HDR1404
19.1 Mpixels/sec
1137
912.8 Kpixels/sec
Ray Tracing993
797.5 Kpixels/sec
727
6.51 Kpixels/sec
Structure from Motion596
5.34 Kpixels/sec
578
18.5 Words/sec
Speech Recognition524
16.7 Words/sec
478
18.5 images/sec
Machine Learning315
12.2 images/sec